International development charities like Oxfam do great work but when it comes to jobs are they open to people from different work and ethnic backgrounds? My latest article for the Guardian explores why it’s so difficult to get a job with an international development charity.
Bill Gates’ first CV, written in 1974 when he was 18 years old, was recently unearthed by Seattle’s Living Computer Museum. It shows an ambitious young man who wanted to become a “systems analyst or systems programmer” on a salary of $15,000 (£10,000) and stated that he was willing to “work anywhere”. In the subsequent 40 years as the head of Microsoft, Gates became one of the richest men in the world, formed the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000 and then left Microsoft eight years later to dedicate his life to eradicating poverty. Yet, based on his international development experience alone Gates would not get a campaigning job with Oxfam or any other international NGO.
Why is it so difficult to get a job in international development? Many charities now rightly recruit from within the country or region they are operating in, so getting a UK-based job is highly competitive. Consequently many jobs are massively oversubscribed and that makes it a perfect employers’ market. As a result I believe that when it comes to many research, advocacy and campaigning roles, the UK international development sector has become a closed shop to people from unconventional backgrounds. And my evidence is my own career. READ MORE
I’m proud to say that tomorrow I will be accompanying Bill Betts, a 91 year old D Day veteran, back to Normandy for the D Day 70 commemorations on friday. Bill lives in a village near me and we met in the local pub one Remembrance Day a few years ago. Bill joined the Essex Yeomanry in 1942 and trained as a radio operator on Sherman tanks. He was one of the first ashore on Gold beach on D Day where he was directing fire against German gun emplacements defending the small village of Le Hamel. Within 45 minutes of landing he was shot by a sniper hiding in a field above the beach who also killed the soldier next to him.
Bill knew the sniper would finish him off if he moved a muscle so he pretended to be dead until the village was eventually cleared. He then spent an agonizing 10 hours lying injured on the beach until he was evacuated at the end of D Day. After six weeks in hospital Bill rejoined his regiment and fought his way into Germany being one of the first people across the Rhine in a floating Sherman Duplex Drive tank. This is commonly known to the troops as a Donald Duck! Bill still has the scar on his leg and told me that 70 years on he never thought he’d see that bloody beach again. I’ll be tweeting throughout the commemorations and also posting pictures on my website.
Seventy years after the Second World War there is a second battle going on in Malta. As an amateur historian who studies the war I know Malta has earned its place in history. Now its time once again for the people of Malta to rise up in the defence of their island.
During the Second World War Malta was the most bombed place on earth as the RAF fought the Luftwaffe for control of the stategically placed island. Last year I saw a programme on the BBC about the battle in which the historian James Holland found the remains of a Spitfire still buried in a field. During the war the bravery of all the people was officially recognised by King George VI, who awarded the George Cross to the entire island.
This time the battle for Malta features real birds, not warbirds. Chris Packham is highlighting the illegal slaughter of migrating birds over the island by hunters in a project called ‘Malta massacre on migration’. Its a self financed project which is very close to Chris’s heart. Every day this week until saturday he will post a video on YouTube at 9pm UK time to publicise the slaughter. READ MORE
Subscribe to my blog
- The RSPB response to my article. Licensing not a ban, reform not a ballot. So much for Nature's Voice. @MarkAvery… https://t.co/zwzPGeOjhk,
- Hi @GeorgeMonbiot my @guardianopinion on why RSPB is wrong not to back ban on driven grouse shooting. Please RT. https://t.co/hQjECgkxQH,
- So @Natures_Voice what your view on @guardianopinion on why RSPB is wrong not to back ban on driven grouse shooting https://t.co/hQjECgkxQH,
- My @guardianopinion on why RSPB is wrong not to back ban on driven grouse shooting @MarkAvery @ChrisGPackham https://t.co/hQjECgkxQH,
- Grouse shooting estates shored up by millions in subsidies https://t.co/huYsIsf6zu,